Garmin
I Ran a 10K With a Top-of-the-Line Garmin on One Wrist and a Budget Model on the Other, and Here's What Happened
· By Endurance Wire
Last weekend I strapped two different Garmin running watches to my wrists and raced a 10K. On one arm, I wore the Forerunner 970 , Garmin's top-of-the-line, $750 running watch. On the other, I wore the Forerunner 165 Music , which is far more budget-friendly at $300. I wanted to see if having a fancy running watch really makes a difference during a race. The answer is complicated. Consider this: The weekend before my race, the winners of the London Marathon competed wearing the Forerunner 55 and the Forerunner 255 —two watches that are, by tech standards, practically ancient.
More Garmin this month
- Amazon Deals of the Day: Forget the Apple Watch, You Can Take $500 Off the Garmin Epix Pro
- Garmin MARQ (Gen 2) Gets Rare $300 Discount as Premium Line Shows Its Age
- Garmin Forerunner 265 running smartwatch drops to $374.95 on Amazon
- The Garmin Epix Pro Smartwatch Is Half Off Right Now
- The Garmin Forerunner 170 nails almost everything – but just how beginner-friendly is it?
- "It changed how I cycle": Why Garmin's smart light and radar is a solo cyclist's essential